This Does Not Need to Be a Shouting Match

Debates on tobacco and nicotine policy within the European Union have often been characterised by strong views and high levels of engagement. This reflects the importance of the issue. Tobacco use remains a leading cause of preventable disease, and decisions taken by policymakers have long-term implications for public health across Member States. However, the intensity…

Sweden Is Proving That Harm Reduction Works

Across the European Union, tobacco control policy has long focused on reducing smoking prevalence through a combination of regulatory restrictions, public health campaigns, and excise taxation. These approaches have contributed to meaningful progress over time. However, smoking remains a leading cause of preventable disease, and reducing its impact continues to be a central objective of…

Rules and Taxes Need to Pull in the Same Direction

European tobacco and nicotine policy is shaped by several regulatory instruments. Among the most important are the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), which establishes product standards and regulatory requirements, and the Tobacco Excise Directive (TED), which governs how tobacco products are taxed across the European Union. Although these two frameworks address different aspects of regulation, their…

Public Health Should Be Built on Results

Public health policy often develops through long institutional processes. Regulations are debated, negotiated, and revised through multiple stages of consultation and political review. This is particularly true in the European Union, where legislative frameworks such as the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) and the Tobacco Excise Directive (TED) shape tobacco and nicotine policy across all Member…

Tax Policy Shapes Choices

The revision of the European Union’s Tobacco Excise Directive (TED) presents an important moment for policymakers to reconsider how taxation influences tobacco and nicotine use across Member States. While excise policy is often described as a technical fiscal instrument, its impact extends far beyond government revenue. Tax policy directly shapes consumer behaviour, market dynamics, and…

Nicotine, Cognition and Mental Health: Implications for Evidence-Based Regulation

Debates around nicotine policy often focus narrowly on dependence and youth protection. Far less frequently examined, but increasingly discussed in scientific and policy literature, is nicotine’s relationship with cognition and mental health. Emerging research suggests that nicotine may have measurable short-term effects on attention, working memory, and executive function. At the same time, long-standing concerns…

GINN Insight: Article 5.3 and Harm Reduction: Governance Safeguard or Policy Constraint?

Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) has become one of the most frequently cited provisions in contemporary nicotine policy debates. The clause is concise: “In setting and implementing their public health policies with respect to tobacco control, Parties shall act to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests…

Austria’s 2026 Nicotine Pouch Framework: What It Signals for Germany and the EU

From April 2026, Austria will implement its first fully defined national regulatory framework for nicotine pouches. The reform moves the category from a fragmented legal grey zone into a structured regime anchored in tobacco legislation, combining legal availability with strict controls on youth access, sales channels, product standards, and taxation. The shift is not a…